Too much information to piece together
Candidate details live across résumés, portfolios, work samples, and interview notes.
TrueRole evaluates candidates against what the role requires, bringing in evidence from work samples, interviews, and team feedback as hiring progresses—so your team can see how each candidate fits the role, why, and what still needs validation.
Start with what matters for the role, then evaluate each candidate against those requirements. Then get a deeper understanding as work samples, interviews, and team feedback come in.

Combine the job description, confirmed role attributes, and evaluation frameworks to define what matters for the role.
Analyze résumés against the role’s criteria, then go deeper into portfolios, case studies, and other work samples when useful.
Invite selected candidates to clarify what remains unclear in their evaluation, on their own time, by video, audio, or text.
Prepare tailored questions based on the candidate’s evaluation and role criteria, then add interview transcripts to deepen the same evaluation.
Review team feedback alongside the candidate’s evaluation and shared criteria to support a more informed hiring decision.
Preserve evaluations, feedback, and decision history so your team can revisit past candidates for new roles.
Another unexplained score doesn’t make the decision clearer. TrueRole shows what matters for the role, what supports the evaluation, and what still needs to be understood.
Candidate details live across résumés, portfolios, work samples, and interview notes.
Recruiters and hiring managers can apply different criteria to the same candidate pool.
Generic summaries and rushed interviews can leave important gaps unexplored.
Create roles, add candidates, and review the evidence behind each evaluation in TrueRole. An ATS is not required. If you already use one, TrueRole helps you examine how candidates fit each role while your ATS manages recruiting.
Manage applicants, hiring stages, and records
Requirements · Supporting evidence · Open questions
Review the evidence and decide what moves forward
Integration availability varies by workspace.
A candidate isn’t inherently a great or poor fit. Fit depends on the role, the organization, what the person is expected to accomplish, and what their materials actually show.
Change the role, seniority, or organization, and the evaluation should change too.
A shared way to understand fit, supporting evidence, gaps, and what still needs validation.
TrueRole evaluates each candidate against the responsibilities, seniority, and context of the active role—not as a universal score attached to the person.
Start with a role-fit overview, then open any evaluation to inspect the requirements, supporting materials, and unresolved questions.
Principal-level ownership across complex product work.
Connects design decisions to measurable customer results.
TrueRole begins with a consistent first-pass analysis, then lets your team review portfolios, work samples, and other supporting materials in more depth when useful.
Map the resume or application to the active role criteria—typically in about 20–30 seconds.
Inspect portfolios, work samples, and supporting material when the closer look is useful.
Not every candidate needs deeper analysis. TrueRole helps your team bring the more closely aligned candidates into focus, then spend human attention where it is most useful.
Supported experience, missing information, open questions, and risks remain distinct so your team knows what to examine next.
The reviewed materials don’t show enough to support a role requirement.
Relevant information may exist, but it wasn’t found in the reviewed sources.
The experience is relevant, but ownership or seniority needs a closer look.
The available evidence points to a concern the team should examine.
What you’ve learned about a candidate should help shape what you ask next.
Ask focused follow-up questions about what remains unclear in a candidate’s evaluation. Write your own or draft them with AI, then review and edit before inviting selected candidates.
Candidates respond through a private, company-branded link using video, audio, or text. Their answers become part of the same role-specific evaluation—helping your team decide whether to schedule an interview and what to explore next.
More context for your team. Less scheduling overhead. Room for candidates to explain their experience.

TrueRole generates questions from what the candidate’s materials show, the gaps, and the role criteria—then explains why to ask, what to listen for, and useful follow-ups.
Upload interview transcripts to bring the conversation into the candidate’s evaluation. TrueRole analyzes the discussion against the role’s criteria, keeping new information connected to what your team already knows.
The submitted work describes strong delivery outcomes, but the candidate’s direct quality bar and decision ownership need live validation.
Recruiters, hiring managers, and interviewers do different work. TrueRole keeps role criteria, candidate information, gaps, and open questions in one shared view—then lets each person add their judgment.
Focus the first pass on what matters for the role and the questions that remain.
Review the same role criteria, candidate information, and open questions before deciding.
Use focused questions to explore what the materials don’t yet establish.
Evaluate every applicant through one shared, role-specific lens.
TrueRole for hiring teamsKeep every client, role, and candidate evaluation distinct.
TrueRole for staffing agenciesTrueRole isn’t built to replace recruiter or hiring-manager judgment. It gives the people making hiring decisions better information with which to exercise that judgment.
Candidate information deserves care, too. Understand how TrueRole uses it, who can access it, and your options for deletion.
Explore trust & privacyGive TrueRole a role and see clearer, role-specific evaluation in action.